Hunting coyotes with hounds

What the OP was discussing seemed to match the description of Red Wolves.

What your guys response was seemed to match the description of high school chick behavior.
 
GC said:
So this thread isn't about hunting coyotes with dogs at all. It's Joe looking for a fresh place to spew his BS. Old Joe is trying to duck into a new room full of the uninitiated to attempt to get some attention from those who aren't on to him yet. This post isn't about hunting at all, it is spamming the forum from an attention whore wanna-be expert.
Click to expand...
It WAS about hounds/dogs. Until the personal attacks started. You & your cronies will continue to make personal attacks on my post. Like...you know, forever.
 
spotstalkshoot said:
Joe, wind from the north of course it's blowing south. BUT you failed to say what direction the coyote's head is in relation to the clock. Or the wind speed and air temp. I could save you a walk and no shot.
Click to expand...
Being a "spot/stalk" Hunter. YOU would know 99.9% of the time. A coyote will BE facing a down wind direction.
 
Hecouldgoalltheway said:
Are you guys like a tag team?

When one of you start drooling too hard, the other one jumps in with an oblique argument, totally unrelated to the conversation?
Click to expand...
Remember way back when...You told me. Blue fur on a coyote is not truly blue. But it is a mixture of silver & black. You know as in "black bears". Well I never bought into that explanation. So I researched it. I found out the blue colored hue on a black bear. Was due to a "genetic mutation". NOT from the blending of silver with black. The rare bluish hue colored black bear. Is called a "Glacier Bear". Thus in summation. your explanation didn't wash. Try again... That coyote I posted a pic of. Had a very dark/bluish colored muzzle. Also the demarcation line between the dark muzzle & off white face. Had a VERY thin line of Blur fur. Was it a coyote? IMHO it was. However, where that thin line of actual "Blue" come from. I have no idea. IF...I were to guess. I would say somewhere way back in it's Heritage/DNA. Was some DNA from a dog. Not a Glacier black bear. lol!!
 
medic joe said:
Remember way back when...You told me. Blue fur on a coyote is not truly blue. But it is a mixture of silver & black. You know as in "black bears". Well I never bought into that explanation. So I researched it. I found out the blue colored hue on a black bear. Was due to a "genetic mutation". NOT from the blending of silver with black. The rare bluish hue colored black bear. Is called a "Glacier Bear". Thus in summation. your explanation didn't wash. Try again... That coyote I posted a pic of. Had a very dark/bluish colored muzzle. Also the demarcation line between the dark muzzle & off white face. Had a VERY thin line of Blur fur. Was it a coyote? IMHO it was. However, where that thin line of actual "Blue" come from. I have no idea. IF...I were to guess. I would say somewhere way back in it's Heritage/DNA. Was some DNA from a dog. Not a Glacier black bear. lol!!
Click to expand...
Lets talk about Biologist's here for a moment. You know..."believe in the science, blah...blah..blah". Darwin, believed mankind evolved from the Neanderthal. I believe mankind is the creation from God. Who according to the Holy Bible. God made man in his image. So which is true? Some of you tout the "science" don't you. So who is correct? God or Darwin?
 
medic joe said:
Lets talk about Biologist's here for a moment. You know..."believe in the science, blah...blah..blah". Darwin, believed mankind evolved from the Neanderthal. I believe mankind is the creation from God. Who according to the Holy Bible. God made man in his image. So which is true? Some of you tout the "science" don't you. So who is correct? God or Darwin?
Click to expand...
Did Darwin believe in sasquatch?

Wait, I wonder if sasquatch can be blue.
 
medic joe said:
Lets talk about Biologist's here for a moment. You know..."believe in the science, blah...blah..blah". Darwin, believed mankind evolved from the Neanderthal. I believe mankind is the creation from God. Who according to the Holy Bible. God made man in his image. So which is true? Some of you tout the "science" don't you. So who is correct? God or Darwin?
Click to expand...
Sooo in summation. If you choose God is true/correct. Then you also admit Biology is not always 100% FACT.
 
Rock Knocker said:
What the OP was discussing seemed to match the description of Red Wolves.

What your guys response was seemed to match the description of high school chick behavior.
Click to expand...
The title of the OP is " hunting coyotes with hounds"....
I responded to one of 10 the questions in this thread...since I know a lot of people here in PA that hunt with hounds I read the OP.
 
medic joe said:
Here another question for the experts.

Example; 1 square mile section surrounded by gravel roads. That section is "table top flat". In the middle of that mile section is a bedded coyote. Wind is blowing from due north, blowing south.

Using a clock dial. The coyote being in the middle. Which direction would you close the gap for a shot? Explain your tactic.
Click to expand...
 
Hecouldgoalltheway said:
This man just attempted to say:

You either believe me, or you don't believe in God.

The hubris
Click to expand...
Not what I said & you know it.

If this site is or has lost members or continually is losing members. I believe much of that is due. To the verbal harassment of others. Then moments later their buddies pounce for more harassment. My attackers on here. Accuse me of the very thing, they are guilty of. As they deflect & project as per usual.
 
medic joe said:
Not what I said & you know it.

If this site is or has lost members or continually is losing members. I believe much of that is due. To the verbal harassment of others. Then moments later their buddies pounce for more harassment. My attackers on here. Accuse me of the very thing, they are guilty of. As they deflect & project as per usual.
Click to expand...
Who are you talking to? You aren't Braveheart, you're a guy who keeps starting arguements by vomiting controversial opinions on us and then beating us over the head with them until we engage, and then once you've been thoroughly embarrassed by logic and factual information, now..... you want to pretend that you're the victim?

Interesting.
 
medic joe said:
It WAS about hounds/dogs. Until the personal attacks started. You & your cronies will continue to make personal attacks on my post. Like...you know, forever.
Click to expand...

Not true. You made the title about hunting with hounds. But in the very first post, you began the whole biology BS with your 65-pound coyote and long-flowing hair cross-breeding crap. Your intent from the get-go was to start spewing your garbage on a whole new group of folks. I think you have the distinction of being one of a very small handful of knuckleheads that Leonard banned from his website. And that takes a tremendous amount of doing for Leonard to throw someone out. You earned the name "hole-huffer!" Those boys don't tolerate such foolish BS as you regurgitate repeatedly. Even here with the heavily moderated family-friendly be nice website you are now on your third screen name. When you're talking chit on the Internet you can expect someone will call you out on it. You simply cannot continue to press the fight and then play the victim. You can't participate in a discussion because you won't tolerate any disagreement from your "observations." As soon as there is a differing point of view or a challenge to provide some proof of whatever you are claiming to be fact, at that point you claim victim status and begin your non-logical diatribe.
 
Last edited:
GC said:
I think you have the distinction of being one of a very small handful of knuckleheads that Leonard banned from his website.
Click to expand...

I'm in that small group too. Leonard banned me as well. And I'm in an even smaller group of banned that have not been granted reprieve.

But, myself, I'm philosophically opposed to banning, on GP. Sometimes, it just needs to happen. But it takes a lot,; more than I have experienced so far as an Admin on this site, to get me to vote for banning.

That said... Having three user names, is, in fact, a violation of TOS here. And clear cut grounds for banning. And I know for a fact it is true in this case. Still, I'm just not comfortable with banning. Having been banned from the old Coyote Gods, Leonard's board, and, for a time, even here. I think all three were total BS. So, it takes a heckuva lot, a real whole heckuva lot, to get me onboard with banning anyone.

I prefer to just let the nutcases be their own nutcase self's. The Members are more than smart enough to see through the BS on their own. They don't need us Admin's making it official. That's just my take, of course. And I've always been on the losing side of that when it comes to a vote.

- DAA
 
DAA said:
I'm in that small group too. Leonard banned me as well. And I'm in an even smaller group of banned that have not been granted reprieve.

But, myself, I'm philosophically opposed to banning, on GP. Sometimes, it just needs to happen. But it takes a lot,; more than I have experienced so far as an Admin on this site, to get me to vote for banning.

That said... Having three user names, is, in fact, a violation of TOS here. And clear cut grounds for banning. And I know for a fact it is true in this case. Still, I'm just not comfortable with banning. Having been banned from the old Coyote Gods, Leonard's board, and, for a time, even here. I think all three were total BS. So, it takes a heckuva lot, a real whole heckuva lot, to get me onboard with banning anyone.

I prefer to just let the nutcases be their own nutcase self's. The Members are more than smart enough to see through the BS on their own. They don't need us Admin's making it official. That's just my take, of course. And I've always been on the losing side of that when it comes to a vote.

- DAA
Click to expand...
There is a thing to be leery of. Some men think the world should be without conflict. They are idealists. Debate is the chess board by which intellectual disagreements (some less intellectual than others) are resolved. It used to be an art form, but digital communication has ruined the perceived need. Now we have a bunch of folks who think we should all just agree about everything or keep quiet. They want to live in an echo chamber where everyone agrees about everything, and if that can't be done, we pretend that it doesn't matter. Well, it matters. Our country wasn't founded by men who refused to engage in conflict or debate. Soft men almost cost us this country. Soft men who surrendered morality for peace put us in this position. Soft men should be avoided.
 
Dave,
You were never banned for the same reason Kirby/MJoe was banned for. Completely different situation. And for the record, I am not on the banning bandwagon either. In fact, that is exactly why I quit my Moderator position here. At THAT time there was a heavy hand on the ban hammer. For the record, I am not advocating that anyone be banned.
 
Back
Top