varminter .223
Well-known member
Originally Posted By: Redneckbmxer24Originally Posted By: varminter .223Originally Posted By: Captramrod01Of coarse it's worth a discussion but telling the OP the 22 Nosler is better at killing coyotes is just bad advise. From what I've seen both are capable of shooting the lighter bullets at close to the same speed with the advantage going to the Valk. On top of that the Valk can also shoot the heavies if one chooses to.
All you guys keep telling him that it's close to the same speed as a Nosler but you know what it's not the same speed. Oh but you have the option of Heavy's just like let's buy a dually truck to get groceries in just in case we wanted to know a heavy boat.
"But the water capacity difference!"...If you have ever worked with the x47, br, norma mag or similar case designs you'd know that these newer case designs are very efficient. The Valk case design is very similar to those and reaps the benefits.
I'm failing to see a reason not to go Valk. The 22 Nosler did not catch on and is clearly dying while the exact opposite is true for the Valk. Better brass, more efficient case design, ability to run light or heavy, industry support. Seems like a win to me.
You guys keep saying the valkyrie will get close to the 22 Nosler with speed why would you want to get close to the speed when you can just have a 22 nosler. Oh I guess you want the option of shooting heavy slow bullets. How about the option of shooting a lighter bullet even faster.
Telling someone to build a rifle that shoots the bullet they want to shoot slowerer just in case they want to shoot a heavier bullet sounds like bad advice to me
Again, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Valkyrie will shoot light bullets just as well and fast as the Nosler but do a whole lot more and with better brass and ammo availability. But can't tell you anything because you've got your mind made up that Nosler is the end all be all, because its what you bought and you're stuck on it.
I think you need to look back at your first post here and reread it. You said your number one reason to not shoot the 22 Nosler was soft brass end cycling issues. The brass is not soft it isnt going to wear out any faster than anything else and they cycle just fine.
All you guys keep telling him that it's close to the same speed as a Nosler but you know what it's not the same speed. Oh but you have the option of Heavy's just like let's buy a dually truck to get groceries in just in case we wanted to know a heavy boat.
"But the water capacity difference!"...If you have ever worked with the x47, br, norma mag or similar case designs you'd know that these newer case designs are very efficient. The Valk case design is very similar to those and reaps the benefits.
I'm failing to see a reason not to go Valk. The 22 Nosler did not catch on and is clearly dying while the exact opposite is true for the Valk. Better brass, more efficient case design, ability to run light or heavy, industry support. Seems like a win to me.
You guys keep saying the valkyrie will get close to the 22 Nosler with speed why would you want to get close to the speed when you can just have a 22 nosler. Oh I guess you want the option of shooting heavy slow bullets. How about the option of shooting a lighter bullet even faster.
Telling someone to build a rifle that shoots the bullet they want to shoot slowerer just in case they want to shoot a heavier bullet sounds like bad advice to me
Again, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Valkyrie will shoot light bullets just as well and fast as the Nosler but do a whole lot more and with better brass and ammo availability. But can't tell you anything because you've got your mind made up that Nosler is the end all be all, because its what you bought and you're stuck on it.
I think you need to look back at your first post here and reread it. You said your number one reason to not shoot the 22 Nosler was soft brass end cycling issues. The brass is not soft it isnt going to wear out any faster than anything else and they cycle just fine.
Last edited: