Mark,
I'm sure you've hunted plenty, and if you haven't seen any mange in all that time of hunting, yes, you've been blessed.
I usually see one, maybe two cases of it a year around here.
But that's not just my kills alone. Maybe one of Dennis', or one of the other guys I know.
The preliminary signs, like I mentioned, are sometimes very hard to tell. It can easily appear as a matted, or chewed looking tail, or bald spot on the back or flank of the animal. If the fur isn't darn near perfect, and I see something like I mentioned, I'll toss it. But not without very close scrutiny first. Too hard to get them in the first place, so I don't give them up easily.
I think there are isolated pockets of it here & there, but for the most part, it remains in check. It's when the hunting/trapping drops way off that it seems to get out of hand.
Too bad I didn't have a field camera to photo it. I've been trying to get my hands on a less expensive digital camera to carry in the field now that John has the easy photo attachment over at
CM.
It would allow many to look & compare. Hell, Dennis and I weren't sure even, but when in doubt, toss it.
Comparing the look of the tail, with the way the fox was acting, it appeared to be the case. He wasn't at all coming to the call, and (through the scope) looked sick. He just sat in that one spot and appeared ill.
Oh by the way;
Quote:
With the fox in a semi crouching position, I aimed for the neck/chest juncture, but upon further exam, I saw a large exit wound in the neck area, under the jaw, and along the jawline up to the back of the ear. The edges of the wound were smooth (like an exit only wound) and didn't have the damage that a peripheral hit (which I thought might've happened ) usually creates.
I haven't seen a bit of that kind of damage with the Super Jet to date, and with the poor shooting setup, I must've pulled the shot a little right.
I'm zero'd at 210yds., and the impact point at 100yds. is a known 1.5 inches, also if the uphill angle was enough, all combined, it might have an affect,.....so who knows ? I try to map my loads and their trajectories, and guessing the distance at 160-175 yds. or so, that load would still be 1 - 1.25inches high by my software.... so I guess it makes sense.
I figured this problem out yesterday. I grabbed the .22 Super Jet and headed out to the bench/range in the back yard. The wind was about nill, and as I was getting setup, one of those "real heavy" snowflake snows started in. I got the 4 wheeler out and headed down to the 200yd. target and stapled up a couple of my long range diamond targets. Good thing I used them because I could barely see them in the scope with the heavy stuff coming down.
I fired off 4 rounds, and I could see where I was 1-1.5" high, and about the same to the right. With the poor visibility, the group was still suprisingly good and allowed me to see "why" the round caught the fox "high & to the right".
When I shot the fox, I was puzzled where it hit because it "felt" good, and my aim felt good as well.
Re-shooting after an incident like that is the only way to confirm that it's either the gun, or you. Most times I blame myself, as I usually sight in at longer ranges most of the time anyway. But, I don't remember shooting the Super Jet at 200yds, to fine tune it.
Maybe I did the .22-250 and only thought I had done the Super Jet.....don't know. Getting old.......
Take care,
Bob