Madison’s Tragedy: How Policies Failed Our Schools Again

Foxpro.223

Well-known member

In a quiet classroom at Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin, the unspeakable happened once again: two dead, six wounded, and an entire community shattered. The shooter, a 15-year-old, turned a study hall into a scene of terror before taking her own life. Predictably, political rhetoric came swiftly, as did the tired solutions that follow every school shooting.

President Biden spoke of "prayers" and “unacceptable” violence, sentiments as sterile as they are predictable. Vice President Harris decried the “senseless gun violence” while the drive-by media spun inflated statistics—650 mass shootings a year, they claim, as if this carnage occurs on every street corner. It doesn’t. But that’s the problem. Public massacres, like the one in Madison, occur in places that we’ve willfully left defenseless.

Gun-free zones
The very words drip with irony. There is nothing safe about disarming the law-abiding while leaving criminals emboldened. A gun-free zone is a target—an irresistible siren call to those who want to kill as many as possible, as quickly as possible. Nearly 94% of mass public shootings since 1950 have occurred in gun-free zones, according to research from the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), which analyzed data on mass shootings in the U.S. over the last several decades. Why? Because murderers are cowards, not crusaders. They seek defenseless victims, not resistance.

The Failed Logic of Gun-Free Zones

The Madison shooter chose her venue deliberately, just as the Covenant School shooter did last year in Tennessee. The Covenant shooter explicitly avoided a secondary location because of “too much security,” according to police reports. This cowardice is consistent: the Buffalo supermarket shooter in 2022 admitted in his manifesto that he targeted an area where concealed carry permits were outlawed.

Yet the politicians and pundits pretend ignorance. Instead of addressing the root of the problem—defenseless soft targets—they tout gun-free zones as virtuous policies. It’s worth asking President Biden why he feels safe behind armed guards and fences at the White House but thinks schoolchildren can be protected by nothing more than a “No Guns Allowed” sign.

If “Gun-Free Zone” signs worked, the U.S. Capitol wouldn’t need security. Yet politicians rely on armed protection for themselves because they know such measures are essential. Their refusal to apply the same logic to schools speaks to a deeper hypocrisy: they prioritize their own safety while ignoring the vulnerability of America’s children. It’s not ignorance; it’s political convenience. Replace those guards with placards declaring the building weaponless and watch how quickly Congress demands action. Of course, they know better. They protect themselves, but leave our children vulnerable.

The Data We Ignore
  • Since 1998, 82% of mass shootings occurred in places where firearms were banned.
  • Schools that permit concealed carry for staff have seen zero mass shootings during school hours. Zero.
  • States like Utah and New Hampshire allow any teacher with a concealed carry permit to carry a firearm on campus. In nineteen other states, local districts make that call. Yet where such policies exist, the grim scenes we saw in Madison simply do not happen.
To this day, critics raise alarmist fears about “armed teachers snapping” or students grabbing weapons, but these scenarios have never materialized. Not once. Instead, the data reveal an uncomfortable truth: gun-free zones work only for killers. The law-abiding comply, the criminals rejoice.

A Return to Common Sense

The solution to Madison’s tragedy—and others like it—is not complicated. First, abolish gun-free zones in schools. Replace them with policies that deter attackers and protect students. Allow teachers and staff—volunteers who are trained and licensed—to carry concealed weapons. This doesn’t mean turning schools into fortresses but turning classrooms into deterrents.

Sheriff Kurt Hoffman of Sarasota County, Florida, put it plainly: “A deputy in uniform… may as well be holding up a neon sign saying, ‘Shoot me first.’”
Hoffman’s point underscores the need for tactical discretion. Uniformed guards, while a visible deterrent, can inadvertently become the first targets. Schools should adopt the strategies used in aviation security, where plainclothes air marshals blend in seamlessly. Similarly, plainclothes or covertly armed staff can provide critical protection without drawing attention to themselves. This element of unpredictability forces attackers to reconsider their plans, knowing that resistance could come from anywhere.

He’s right. Security must be strategic, not theatrical. This is why air marshals on planes don’t wear uniforms. Schools could adopt similar measures: armed staff members concealed among their colleagues, indistinguishable from any other teacher. Let potential attackers wonder who might shoot back.

Dispelling the Misleading Narrative

Much of this debate has been hijacked by misleading claims. President Biden’s “650 mass shootings” figure comes from the Gun Violence Archive (GVA), a gun control advocacy group that classifies even nonfatal injuries in domestic disputes as “mass shootings.” Yet there is a reason Uvalde and Madison dominate the headlines: the horror of indiscriminate public slaughter is unique, and rare. Inflating the numbers undermines genuine solutions.

The FBI focuses on public shootings—those where attackers seek out undefended targets. Under that definition, mass public shootings are increasing, but still average only 3.9 attacks per year since 1998. This isn’t about “daily gun violence”; it’s about ensuring that when evil strikes, it meets resistance.

The Costs of Willful Naïveté

Gun-free zones persist because they are politically convenient. They offer the illusion of safety, not the reality. They allow politicians to feel like they’ve acted, even as they make the next Madison inevitable. If you doubt this, consider California: the state with the strictest gun laws also has the highest per capita rate of mass public shootings since 2000—far above the national average. Why? Because laws disarm the innocent and embolden the guilty.

The Moral Responsibility to Act

Parents send their children to school believing it is a place of learning and growth. They should not have to wonder if it will be their child’s last day. Abundant Life Christian School, like too many before it, learned this lesson at a terrible cost.

But Madison does not have to become just another tragic name. It should be a call to action. We must abolish gun-free zones and replace hollow virtue-signaling with policies that work: trained, armed, and concealed staff. We must admit what the attackers already know—soft targets invite slaughter.

It is time to defend our schools the way we defend our leaders. Anything less is a failure of moral responsibility.

"If you want peace, prepare for war," the Roman author Vegetius wrote.

Schools do not need to become battlegrounds, but they do need to be fortified. Because when the next coward comes seeking defenseless victims, let him find resistance instead.
 
Agree partially with what you say. You have to ask 'can you shoot another person?' and expect an honest answer. And the honest answer from most school staff will be NO. For this reason, most schools are geared toward 'lockdown' and entry protection. Same with businesses. Real question with the access restriction method is how to make them gun-free?
I will state realistically, most 'shooters' are social media freaks. Period. And lonely/under 'appreciated' persons.
 
bad guys will never confront an armed individual or someone that looks like they can fight. bad guys are not bad guys unless they have a weapon or friends with them.

one on one, unarmed, rarely ever happens. same with gangs, all useless unless in a pack or well armed.

something had to be seriously wrong with this person for her to do these things :cry:
:(
 
"bad guys will never confront an armed individual or someone that looks like they can fight" -- proved wrong so many times. Recent evidence, - LEOs shot in Texas after a NORMAL traffic stop. IIRC, 2 in the last month, N. Texas.
 
Most mass shooting(vehicle or stabbings) events are "ambush". Group of unsuspecting people confronted without warning by firearm, knife or vehicle where there " shouldn't be any". Parents, relatives, friends must intervene when individuals display unusual, anti- social behavior or out of "normal behavior". The last one is tough, because public schools are rewarding, advancing "the it's your right to ignore social norms". This is very confusing for children, resulting in behavior issues with many more individuals. Not just the few with easily identified mental/abuse problems.
 
Another factor is the advent of career moms necessitated by high cost of living. When I was growing up most moms mentored the kids and taught them the basics before they ever went to school. Nowadays most youngsters start daycare at an early age and miss out on the closer family ties.
That and the fact that, unbeknown to most parents, our schools have been "socialized", for lack of a better term and are teaching our kids a lot of garbage we would not approve of if we had known. Especially the colleges.
Pardon the rant from an old f***. JMO, of course one shoe does not fit all.
 
Personal experience - call to my kids principal - while he was getting shot by mom who was mad for her son getting kicked out for a bad haircut. Kinda started the metal detector/xray security stuff long time ago. Training for courts/prisons/schools/events pre TSA. Stories I could tell. Took a couple years for schools to accept the idea. School 'atmosphere' is so -- retarded. Friend was a 'jailer' but quit as he couldn't carry to and from (uniformed 'target').
 
And they keep on insisting gun free zones work and disarm the "good guys". Quite a few schools have gone to armed teachers (volunteers) and to my knowledge there has not been a single shooting at schools that have chosen this route.

Op-ed by Dr. John Lott after school shooting in MT

Dr John Lott Dec 7, 2024
After schools were shut down across Montana last week after phone calls reported a man with a gun was at schools, I had an op-ed in five newspapers about how to properly protect students. Fortunately, there was no such gunman, but it was a wake-up call on the need to let teachers carry concealed handguns.

 
Back
Top