Thousands of multi-year elk hunters agree with you, including those of decades past who harvested cows and the biggest bulls with 87 grain partitions from the then new 25-3000 calibre Savage lever actions. Some areas in the Rocky Mountain states & Canuck provinces didn't take an new elk hunter seriously unless a fella had one of these new 25 calibre Savages in the crok of his arm. Then Remington made the wildcat 25-06 an official cartridge, and it was even better than Savages 25-3000.I have killed 4 cow elk and 2 bull elk with a .25-06 either in neck or double lung. from ranges or 50 yards to 300 plus.
I think it is a perfect rifle for elk.
my wife uses a .243 for elk and has taken 3 cows with it.
we use Nosler Partitions and do wonders on lungs and don't even twitch when shot in neck.
First think you need to figure out is are you good enough. The 25-06 will hold up it's end depending on how you use it. That is where you come in big time! Myself I wouldn't recommend anything smaller than a 6.5 for the heavier bullets available. That alone will give you different shot choice's. I do have a 25-06 and have shot a lot of deer with it but when the animal get's bigger, I get bigger, better bullet's in my opinion!I'm going to get a 25-06. And I need a little advise on whether the 25-06 is big enough to do the job on a elk. I'm getting the 25-06 for pronghorn and shoot a few coyote's. I'm saving my points for a good elk hunt and pronghorn but that's going to take 6 more years at least to have enough points. I'm also thinking about getting a Ar-15 or Ar-10 and worry about the elk and pronghorn later. The ar would be a fun gun and they might be impossible to get real soon. It probably looks like I'm confused and I might be but if anybody has any input that would be great.
I wouldn't take my 25-06 elk hunting for no reason than I believe I have better choices. But if the 25-06 was all I had, I'd take it and not look back! as for using smaller cartridges, I'm not fond of recoil and tend to wind down to something I don't mind shooting as long as I also believe it's adequate.Never understood while anyone wants to choose the smallest caliber available to shoot something. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve head shot some deer with a .22 and stoned them, but it’s not what I’d choose to hunt with. I prefer to overkill vs under gun.
With that said, the caliber of choice for my uncles in NM that hunt elk…the almighty .243, lol.
And there's the catch. "as long as I can put it where it needs to be>>>>" That is the catch with every cartridge and bullet. I shot a 7mm Rem Mag years ago and shot a bunch of 115gr bullet's just for kicks. But if I had to kill something with it and that bullet, no sweat! "Long as I can put it where it needs to be".I shoot a 25-06 for elk here in Wyoming. I shoot a 117 grain bullet at max powder load and have never had a problem yet. As lock as I can put it where it needs to be I have nothing to worry about.
Yes it does, part of the whole scheme, is the user needs to use the bullet how it was intended to be used. It seems sometimes people buy cartridges and bullets to make up for their own short comings, doesn't generally work very well."And there's the catch. "as long as I can put it where it needs to be>>>>" That is the catch with every cartridge and bullet. "
Isn't that the truth?
Poor shot placement saved President Trump! Thank God!
In addition to putting it where it needs to be, a bullet has to perform when it gets there, and that is based on bullet construction. Use a properly constructed bullet for the game you are after.