I bet I can guess most prefer thermal over anything. But I can honestly say when it comes to hunting at night I honestly prefer lights. I've used all three and it's just something about lights that appeal to me. Seeing those shining eyes take shape into an animal as they get closer is just awesome to me. I may be one of the few people that feels that way in todays world.
Which made me think of this question. What is your opinion on the advantages of thermal and night vision over lights or even the other way around?
I see the advantages of both. For example most people I know and maybe most people everywhere buy the bare minimum to get the job done. What isn't talked about and never will be is just how many non-target species are killed because of misidentification? I'd say it probably happens fairly often. The same can happen with lights if you're just shooting at eyes shining. But as a hunter it should be common sense to identify what you're shooting at before you even take the safety off. Even though most of these thermal scopes cost $1,000 to $2,500 which is a lot of money to most, they aren't always the best quality. Which I'd venture to guess that is what your average person is using. I've looked through high end thermal and it's amazing. But not everyone can or will spend that kind of money on a "toy" unless they're getting something out of it.
Of course the advantage to thermal and night vision is no lights to potentially spook animals and better yet to help find downed animals. Which I think is where thermal is a very useful tool for predator hunting at night. For killing hogs I think there's no better tool available than thermal on an AR platform. But huntin with lights is something I hope never goes away. Some of the funnest times I've had huntin was in Texas huntin out of a high rack shining lights with my buddies.
Which made me think of this question. What is your opinion on the advantages of thermal and night vision over lights or even the other way around?
I see the advantages of both. For example most people I know and maybe most people everywhere buy the bare minimum to get the job done. What isn't talked about and never will be is just how many non-target species are killed because of misidentification? I'd say it probably happens fairly often. The same can happen with lights if you're just shooting at eyes shining. But as a hunter it should be common sense to identify what you're shooting at before you even take the safety off. Even though most of these thermal scopes cost $1,000 to $2,500 which is a lot of money to most, they aren't always the best quality. Which I'd venture to guess that is what your average person is using. I've looked through high end thermal and it's amazing. But not everyone can or will spend that kind of money on a "toy" unless they're getting something out of it.
Of course the advantage to thermal and night vision is no lights to potentially spook animals and better yet to help find downed animals. Which I think is where thermal is a very useful tool for predator hunting at night. For killing hogs I think there's no better tool available than thermal on an AR platform. But huntin with lights is something I hope never goes away. Some of the funnest times I've had huntin was in Texas huntin out of a high rack shining lights with my buddies.
Last edited: