YoteSackbuster
New member
http://jollyrogerrevolution.blogspot.com/
Does anyone remember the details of my mass-murder bet? I believe I said there would be a mass shooting within three months (or was it four?), it would happen in a place where firearms were prohibited, the police would avoid doing anything until there was a large body count, the shooter would either be killed or kill himself when it was over, and that the weapon of choice would be a semi-automatic rifle.
There may have been a detail or two that I’ve overlooked, but the Binghamton shooting comes close enough to make my point, even if I wouldn’t have won any bets, and I think I have a month left anyway. The point I was trying to make, if I didn’t already explain it, is that these mass-shootings are predictable because they’re not random acts of violence, but intentionally staged events designed to sway public opinion regarding gun control legislation. We’ve had four of these incidents in the last two months, and it’s no coincidence that the Obama administration is planning to unleash the most stringent gun control legislation America has ever seen. And the time-line is somewhat telling here too. It’s important to remember here that the anti-gun troops were assembled, and the legislation was already written before the shootings took place. It’s after the shootings occur and are widely publicized that the politicians start screaming for “sensible gun controls” and just happen to have a law handy and ready to be rushed through congress.
I made the prediction based on my knowledge of the proposed gun control measures sought by the Obama administration, and the fact that these mass shootings seem to be the standard technique for kicking off a new gun control agenda. To support this claim, we’ll have to look at some statistical evidence concerning these shootings, demonstrate how these shootings coincide with a political agenda, and look at some of the evidentiary anomalies surrounding these events, and of course, explain how an event like this can be made to happen.
First of all we’ll need to look at some numbers, but I’ll make this quick. There are three hundred million people in the United States, and when you’re considering a group of people that large, many things can be expected to happen with some degree of regularity that would be impossible to predict in a group of a hundred, or even a thousand people. It’s very similar to rolling dice. If you roll a pair of dice once, you can never accurately predict what number will result, but if you could bet on rolling that same pair of dice 300 million times, you can bet the kid’s college fund that you’ll roll a seven about 50,010,000 times, or 16.67% of the time, give or take less than one percentage point, and you’ll double the college fund every time.
Why is this crap game silliness important? Because our pool of 300 million people is large enough to accurately tell us (within a few percentage points), how many people will die everyday, how many people will be born everyday, how many cars will crash in a year, and even how many people can be expected to flip their lids, or to state it less rudely, be diagnosed with one mental illness or another. Because a mass-shooting is a relatively rare event it becomes much more difficult to predict statistically, but because our pool is so large, (300 million), it can still be expected to occur with some degree of regularity, especially when you look at these events over a span of a few decades. Unfortunately, what we do see regarding these events is exactly the opposite of what we should expect to see.
These events began happening during the Clinton administration, and they were strangely confined to one profession. Every other month or so, a postal worker would appear at work with an “assault rifle” and use all his co-workers for target practice. It happened so often that the term “going postal” became a common way to describe anyone who was losing their temper, and these shootings, eventually resulted in the assault rifle ban, much to the satisfaction of the Sarah Brady bunch who were spearheading an extremely well funded “grass-roots” gun control campaign, which campaign had absolutely no support until the bullet-ridden bodies of the Columbine kids dominated the evening news for a month.
I guess there might be several social, economic or cultural reasons for a long string of assault rifle shootings beginning, but what’s most strange about these shootings is not that they occurred regularly, but that they suddenly came to a stop, for no discernable reason whatsoever.
After Bush pried his way into the White House the mass-shootings mysteriously ended, seemingly because they were no longer needed, because the Bush league had no interest in gun control. For some unexplainable reason, all of the postal workers became sane and friendly and the assault rifle shootings were history, even though the assault rifle ban had expired and they were readily available again.
The only way any of these mass-shootings would make the least bit of sense is if they were somehow carried out to gain popular support for a gun control agenda, and that’s the only way to explain how they started and stopped on que to coincide with a particular administration’s stance on gun control. If they happened six or eight times per year under Clinton, we should not have gone eight years without seeing it happen once, but that’s exactly what happened. The only exception to this rule would be the Vaginia Tech shootings, which happened during the very end of Bush’s unfortunate reign, possibly at the hands of members of the new regime already in congress.
Am I supposed to believe that after eight years without a mass-shooting it’s just a coincidence that they’ve returned to haunt us at a rate of two per month just as an administration comes to power that wants to pass drastic new gun control laws? The stopping and starting of these events to coincide with a particular administration’s views on gun control is too obvious, and the statistical anomaly of their occurrence makes it foolish to believe otherwise, but if I’m suggesting that these incidents are by design, I also have to explain how someone would go about causing this to occur.
As it happens, it’s not very difficult at all to create the Manchurian candidate needed to carry this out, especially if he happens to be taking anti-depressants. If a person has a prescription for these drugs, and is imbued with violent thoughts or fantasies by his own doing or with the help of a handler, he only needs to miss one dose of his medicine before he starts acting out his worst nightmares, or most violent fantasies. When the carnage is over, he’ll not be sure if it were a dream or if it really happened, and that’s why he never lives to explain why he did it. No one has ever witnessed one of these mass shooters take their own life, but that’s always the official account of the event.
I’m guessing that this began with postal workers because as Federal employees, their medical history (and any drugs they were taking) would have been readily available to those who would plan one of these events, but now that we’ve lost our medical privacy, a wider selection of people can be used for these operations.
And what makes these shootings even more suspect are the actions of law enforcement officials at the scene. At Columbine, Vaginia Tech and Binghamton we see that police never made any attempt to stop the killers for up to two hours after the carnage began. At Columbine and Vagina Tech we know the shooters were taking anti-depressants, but as long as we’re limited to the information provided by the mainstream media about these events, it’s easy to how and why that detail has been suppressed by the pharmaceutical companies in the more recent shootings. We’ve seen their ability to keep much bigger items out of the news on several occasions.
In the case of Columbine, there were many witnesses who claimed that there were more than just two shooters, and introduced into court was a tape recording which proved that local police had foreknowledge of the event. Of course, the court records of the Columbine shooting have been suspiciously sealed for decades, so many of the details which prove that this was a staged event are officially suppressed. You have to ask yourself why the courts would prevent the public from knowing the details of a school shooting, and the only answer is that there is much to hide. Columbine was a sloppy job because they were new at this, so the details that implicate people within our government must be kept hidden. I’ll provide links to interviews with some of the victims in which these things will be revealed by people who were at the scene, and have no motive to lie about what happened.
What’s actually happening here is that people within our government want to disarm the American people so they’ll be unable to resist continual abridgements of their freedom and further removal of their wealth. They’ll go about this by sickening you with images of dead children on television until you beg them to make all guns illegal. Many people may support gun controls, but it’s only people with a poor knowledge of history. In the 20th century alone, 120 million people were slaughtered by their own governments right after they were disarmed by “sensible” gun laws. Most recently, the people of England lost their right to own guns, and today English soldiers are being asked if they’d be willing to fire upon English protesters.
The government of the United States, or factions within it, has already demonstrated their willingness to slaughter their own citizens by the thousands based upon lies (Waco), or to sway public opinion . The second amendment of our constitution isn’t is not about shooting deer or ducks during hunting season. It was written so we might defend ourselves from madmen similar to those who rule over us today. Don’t allow your right to bear arms to be infringed and it won’t be. Armed American citizens are the only hope for the preservation of freedom anywhere on the planet. After witnessing a decades-long assault on our freedom, you’d be a fool, and eventually a slave, if you were to allow any more gun controls to be enacted.
Yes, people have died, and more people will. Get used to it. The battle for our freedom will probably not remain limited to writing letters.
– Jolly Roger
“The most effectual means of preserving the peace, is to prepare for war.”
– George Washington
THE PROVEN LINK BETWEEN SSRI DRUGS AND SHOOTING RAMPAGES
http://www.ssristories.com/index.php
Interview with Columbine survivor, Chris Bollyn, and a Dr. Ann Tracy who specializes in serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (class of anti-depressants associated with extreme violence)
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Piper06.html
Does anyone remember the details of my mass-murder bet? I believe I said there would be a mass shooting within three months (or was it four?), it would happen in a place where firearms were prohibited, the police would avoid doing anything until there was a large body count, the shooter would either be killed or kill himself when it was over, and that the weapon of choice would be a semi-automatic rifle.
There may have been a detail or two that I’ve overlooked, but the Binghamton shooting comes close enough to make my point, even if I wouldn’t have won any bets, and I think I have a month left anyway. The point I was trying to make, if I didn’t already explain it, is that these mass-shootings are predictable because they’re not random acts of violence, but intentionally staged events designed to sway public opinion regarding gun control legislation. We’ve had four of these incidents in the last two months, and it’s no coincidence that the Obama administration is planning to unleash the most stringent gun control legislation America has ever seen. And the time-line is somewhat telling here too. It’s important to remember here that the anti-gun troops were assembled, and the legislation was already written before the shootings took place. It’s after the shootings occur and are widely publicized that the politicians start screaming for “sensible gun controls” and just happen to have a law handy and ready to be rushed through congress.
I made the prediction based on my knowledge of the proposed gun control measures sought by the Obama administration, and the fact that these mass shootings seem to be the standard technique for kicking off a new gun control agenda. To support this claim, we’ll have to look at some statistical evidence concerning these shootings, demonstrate how these shootings coincide with a political agenda, and look at some of the evidentiary anomalies surrounding these events, and of course, explain how an event like this can be made to happen.
First of all we’ll need to look at some numbers, but I’ll make this quick. There are three hundred million people in the United States, and when you’re considering a group of people that large, many things can be expected to happen with some degree of regularity that would be impossible to predict in a group of a hundred, or even a thousand people. It’s very similar to rolling dice. If you roll a pair of dice once, you can never accurately predict what number will result, but if you could bet on rolling that same pair of dice 300 million times, you can bet the kid’s college fund that you’ll roll a seven about 50,010,000 times, or 16.67% of the time, give or take less than one percentage point, and you’ll double the college fund every time.
Why is this crap game silliness important? Because our pool of 300 million people is large enough to accurately tell us (within a few percentage points), how many people will die everyday, how many people will be born everyday, how many cars will crash in a year, and even how many people can be expected to flip their lids, or to state it less rudely, be diagnosed with one mental illness or another. Because a mass-shooting is a relatively rare event it becomes much more difficult to predict statistically, but because our pool is so large, (300 million), it can still be expected to occur with some degree of regularity, especially when you look at these events over a span of a few decades. Unfortunately, what we do see regarding these events is exactly the opposite of what we should expect to see.
These events began happening during the Clinton administration, and they were strangely confined to one profession. Every other month or so, a postal worker would appear at work with an “assault rifle” and use all his co-workers for target practice. It happened so often that the term “going postal” became a common way to describe anyone who was losing their temper, and these shootings, eventually resulted in the assault rifle ban, much to the satisfaction of the Sarah Brady bunch who were spearheading an extremely well funded “grass-roots” gun control campaign, which campaign had absolutely no support until the bullet-ridden bodies of the Columbine kids dominated the evening news for a month.
I guess there might be several social, economic or cultural reasons for a long string of assault rifle shootings beginning, but what’s most strange about these shootings is not that they occurred regularly, but that they suddenly came to a stop, for no discernable reason whatsoever.
After Bush pried his way into the White House the mass-shootings mysteriously ended, seemingly because they were no longer needed, because the Bush league had no interest in gun control. For some unexplainable reason, all of the postal workers became sane and friendly and the assault rifle shootings were history, even though the assault rifle ban had expired and they were readily available again.
The only way any of these mass-shootings would make the least bit of sense is if they were somehow carried out to gain popular support for a gun control agenda, and that’s the only way to explain how they started and stopped on que to coincide with a particular administration’s stance on gun control. If they happened six or eight times per year under Clinton, we should not have gone eight years without seeing it happen once, but that’s exactly what happened. The only exception to this rule would be the Vaginia Tech shootings, which happened during the very end of Bush’s unfortunate reign, possibly at the hands of members of the new regime already in congress.
Am I supposed to believe that after eight years without a mass-shooting it’s just a coincidence that they’ve returned to haunt us at a rate of two per month just as an administration comes to power that wants to pass drastic new gun control laws? The stopping and starting of these events to coincide with a particular administration’s views on gun control is too obvious, and the statistical anomaly of their occurrence makes it foolish to believe otherwise, but if I’m suggesting that these incidents are by design, I also have to explain how someone would go about causing this to occur.
As it happens, it’s not very difficult at all to create the Manchurian candidate needed to carry this out, especially if he happens to be taking anti-depressants. If a person has a prescription for these drugs, and is imbued with violent thoughts or fantasies by his own doing or with the help of a handler, he only needs to miss one dose of his medicine before he starts acting out his worst nightmares, or most violent fantasies. When the carnage is over, he’ll not be sure if it were a dream or if it really happened, and that’s why he never lives to explain why he did it. No one has ever witnessed one of these mass shooters take their own life, but that’s always the official account of the event.
I’m guessing that this began with postal workers because as Federal employees, their medical history (and any drugs they were taking) would have been readily available to those who would plan one of these events, but now that we’ve lost our medical privacy, a wider selection of people can be used for these operations.
And what makes these shootings even more suspect are the actions of law enforcement officials at the scene. At Columbine, Vaginia Tech and Binghamton we see that police never made any attempt to stop the killers for up to two hours after the carnage began. At Columbine and Vagina Tech we know the shooters were taking anti-depressants, but as long as we’re limited to the information provided by the mainstream media about these events, it’s easy to how and why that detail has been suppressed by the pharmaceutical companies in the more recent shootings. We’ve seen their ability to keep much bigger items out of the news on several occasions.
In the case of Columbine, there were many witnesses who claimed that there were more than just two shooters, and introduced into court was a tape recording which proved that local police had foreknowledge of the event. Of course, the court records of the Columbine shooting have been suspiciously sealed for decades, so many of the details which prove that this was a staged event are officially suppressed. You have to ask yourself why the courts would prevent the public from knowing the details of a school shooting, and the only answer is that there is much to hide. Columbine was a sloppy job because they were new at this, so the details that implicate people within our government must be kept hidden. I’ll provide links to interviews with some of the victims in which these things will be revealed by people who were at the scene, and have no motive to lie about what happened.
What’s actually happening here is that people within our government want to disarm the American people so they’ll be unable to resist continual abridgements of their freedom and further removal of their wealth. They’ll go about this by sickening you with images of dead children on television until you beg them to make all guns illegal. Many people may support gun controls, but it’s only people with a poor knowledge of history. In the 20th century alone, 120 million people were slaughtered by their own governments right after they were disarmed by “sensible” gun laws. Most recently, the people of England lost their right to own guns, and today English soldiers are being asked if they’d be willing to fire upon English protesters.
The government of the United States, or factions within it, has already demonstrated their willingness to slaughter their own citizens by the thousands based upon lies (Waco), or to sway public opinion . The second amendment of our constitution isn’t is not about shooting deer or ducks during hunting season. It was written so we might defend ourselves from madmen similar to those who rule over us today. Don’t allow your right to bear arms to be infringed and it won’t be. Armed American citizens are the only hope for the preservation of freedom anywhere on the planet. After witnessing a decades-long assault on our freedom, you’d be a fool, and eventually a slave, if you were to allow any more gun controls to be enacted.
Yes, people have died, and more people will. Get used to it. The battle for our freedom will probably not remain limited to writing letters.
– Jolly Roger
“The most effectual means of preserving the peace, is to prepare for war.”
– George Washington
THE PROVEN LINK BETWEEN SSRI DRUGS AND SHOOTING RAMPAGES
http://www.ssristories.com/index.php
Interview with Columbine survivor, Chris Bollyn, and a Dr. Ann Tracy who specializes in serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (class of anti-depressants associated with extreme violence)
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Piper06.html
