If you're in the middle of the powder range, I probably wouldn't worry about the 62's.
Personally, I'd work up a load for the 55/57, and take a grain or so off that for the 62's & save them for rough zero, fouling the bore, or just blasting.
You weighed all 1000? How good's your scale?
I didn't weigh all bullets you can see the 62 grain were a little longer,the others that looked like 55 grain I weighed around 20 all weighed between 55 to 57 grains I think there all close,my scales ok for weighing bullets and powder not real expensive $30If you're in the middle of the powder range, I probably wouldn't worry about the 62's.
Personally, I'd work up a load for the 55/57, and take a grain or so off that for the 62's & save them for rough zero, fouling the bore, or just blasting.
You weighed all 1000? How good's your scale?
I'll use the 62 grain bullets for subsonic loadsI didn't weigh all bullets you can see the 62 grain were a little longer,the others that looked like 55 grain I weighed around 20 all weighed between 55 to 57 grains I think there all close,my scales ok for weighing bullets and powder not real expensive $30
I love the 3.6 gr ....I'm into efficiency today ....I find myself dreading dumping 45 plus grains any more ...Nice big bullet, travels about 900 fps very accurate, also quiet, sounds like a small firecracker 3.6 grains pistol powder no suppressor needed
Yep I agree I use titegroup for the powder, hodgdon even has a load for subsonics, im retired got lots of time to experiment with things. I did tests on different pistol powders,titegroup by far the best,also did accurate #5,unique. Titegroup held all the best numbers, have to look them up.I love the 3.6 gr ....I'm into efficiency today ....I find myself dreading dumping 45 plus grains any more ...